Both are aimed at the same thing: a drone-threat alert on citizens' phones. The difference is in how the preparatory work gets done.
State's SIREN project
Taiga's HÄLYTIN implementation package
We hand the full package to a verified representative of the Finnish state pro bono — no licences, no conditions, no later invoices. The package contains everything a production-grade drone-alert application needs, with the exception of authority interface integrations, infrastructure choices and certifications. Those cannot be done without access to government systems.
Below are examples of the package's output. The full package — including specifications, code and technical documents — is handed over separately to a verified representative of the state.
Example of the package's regulatory documentation — risk identification, mitigations and residual risk under the GDPR.
Download →Example of the package's UX definitions — the citizen's path through alerts, settings and first use.
Download →


What this page does NOT show
We do not publish the application source code, detailed threat models, interface definitions or other technical details on this page. The reason is simple: if the state adopts the package, it must be free to decide which technical details of its alert system to make public. Access to the full package is arranged directly with a verified government representative.
Taiga is building a software factory for regulated industries. A traditional software project advances through meetings, specifications, coding and reviews — months before the first end user sees anything. Most of the time goes not into coding but into waiting, coordination and uncertainty.
Taiga's operating model is different: a human describes where to go — the goals, the boundaries, the quality criteria. The platform does the rest. It researches the regulatory landscape, designs the architecture, produces the specification, the code and the documentation. Every decision is traceable, every choice justifiable, every action compliant. Speed AND control — not either-or.
HÄLYTIN was built this way over a single weekend. What a traditional project would have needed a six- or seven-figure consulting team and months to produce, came out of a small team directing the platform as it executed. The same model works for other regulated domains: banking, healthcare, defence, energy.
Input
Production
Direction and approval
A production application can be built from this package in several ways: with Taiga's own agent orchestrator, with Claude Code, with OpenAI Codex, with closed on-premise AI coding agents — or, if needed, conventionally with human coders. Once the interfaces, target environment, infrastructure and network architecture are decided, the implementation phase is an order of magnitude faster than a traditional software project.
We hand over pro bono
State's responsibility
Decisions on these are made and the necessary software is implemented — on the state's chosen stack, with the package as the blueprint.
This work takes time, but a fraction of SIREN's two-year schedule (and budget). The package gives the state, or a partner of its choice, a ready foundation to build on.
Government representative? Contact Mikko directly →During the March 2026 drone incidents, Estonia warned its citizens by SMS. Finland did not warn. The state announced it would build an alert application — but on a timeline of nearly two years. That timeline has been justified by international comparisons (1.5–2 years elsewhere). This is not a one-application problem — it is a problem of how software is procured.
“Two years for a simple alert application is an absurd timeline when the need is, if anything, for last week.
We did not build a finished application for the state — we could not. We built what every software project should build before coding starts: a production-grade specification any AI agent platform or development team can implement. We wanted to show that an alternative way of operating is possible — not only in this project, but in many other public-sector projects.”
Mikko Laakkonen
CEO and founder, Taiga AI
“I have watched, for a couple of decades now, how the public sector procures software. In projects critical to society and security of supply, money is rarely the issue — time is. When the world changes in weekly cycles, a two-year procurement timeline is itself a security risk.”
Henri Grönlund
Chair of the Board and founder, Taiga AI
The end goal is the same: a drone alert on citizens' phones. SIREN adds the feature to the 112 Suomi app; HÄLYTIN is a standalone implementation package that also ships with a reference implementation. The technology and architecture are independent, but the outcome for the citizen is equivalent.
We do not know. €6.5M is the budget of the state's broader hazard-notification development programme, of which SIREN is a part. Authorities have justified the timeline with international comparisons — similar systems have taken 1.5–2 years to build elsewhere. SIREN's scope of work may include integration and process requirements that are not publicly described. We would be interested to see them.
Not a finished application. A production-grade implementation package: application architecture definition, technical specifications and API descriptions, threat models, DPIA, regulatory analysis, project plan, and reference implementation source code. From the package, a production application can be built an order of magnitude faster than traditionally — with any AI agent platform or a conventional development team.
The implementation package and the work done are handed to the state at no charge. Access to the Taiga platform to finish and deliver the package is included in the offer. Follow-on work, consulting and sitting in meetings are not pro bono.
Two reasons. First, we consider a two-year timeline a security risk for Finns. Second, HÄLYTIN is a concrete example of an alternative way to operate — the package can be implemented on any development stack.
No. We hand it to the Finnish state for security and regulatory reasons. If the state decides to open the package, that is the state's decision.
By contacting Mikko Laakkonen or Henri Grönlund with the details on this page. Directly, without a tender.
Taiga AI is a Helsinki-based software company building an AI software factory for regulated companies and the public sector. More: tai.ga.
What has been said about the project and its timeline in public. Source articles are in Finnish.
“As it stands, development of the application will continue until late 2027, though it may be ready earlier.”
— Jussi Korhonen, Director of Preparedness, Ministry of the Interior
Read the original →“It is a means by which authorities can alert, warn, advise and guide.”
— Jyri Kosola, Engineering Colonel (ret.)
Read the original →“A new feature is being developed for the 112 Suomi app that would warn of a threat from the air.”Read the original →
“The SIREN project's task is to create a separate feature in the 112 Suomi app for communicating a threat from the air.”Read the original →
“It does not mean giving speeches that Finland should be an AI superpower. That says nothing to anyone. You have to start using it.”
— Juha Sipilä, former Prime Minister (Centre Party)
Read the original →Contact for interviews and additional information. Available in Finnish, Swedish and English.
The press release and image pack will be published through this page at the time of the announcement. Logos and portrait photos are available from Taiga's media bank.
Background documents for journalists

Taiga AI Oy is a Helsinki-based software company building an AI software factory for regulated companies and the public sector. On Taiga's platform, software is developed fast, audit-ready and under full control — every decision traceable, every action compliant. The company is based at the Maria 01 campus in Helsinki.